Transmission and Power Strategy
These agreements build on Google’s growing set of strategies to manage electricity needs.
In June of 2025, Google announced a deal with CTC Global to upgrade transmission lines with high-capacity composite conductors that increase throughput without requiring new towers. In July 2025, Google and Brookfield Asset Management unveiled a hydropower framework agreement worth up to $3 billion, designed to secure firm clean energy for data centers in PJM and Eastern markets.
Alongside renewable deals, Google has signed nuclear supply agreements as well, most notably a landmark contract with Kairos Power for small modular reactor capacity. Each of these moves reflects Google’s effort to create more headroom on the grid while securing firm, carbon-free power.
Workload Flexibility and Grid Innovation
The demand-response strategy is uniquely suited to AI data centers because of workload diversity. Machine learning training runs can sometimes be paused or rescheduled, unlike latency-sensitive workloads.
This flexibility allows Google to throttle certain compute-heavy processes in coordination with utilities. In practice, Google can preemptively pause or shift workloads when notified of peak events, ensuring critical services remain uninterrupted while still creating significant grid relief.
Local Utility Impact
For utilities like I&M and TVA, partnering with hyperscale customers has a dual benefit: stabilizing the grid while keeping large customers satisfied and growing within their service territories.
It also signals to regulators and ratepayers that data centers, often criticized for their heavy energy footprint, can actively contribute to reliability. These agreements may help avoid contentious rate cases or delays in permitting new power plants.
Policy, Interconnection Queues, and the Economics of Speed
One of the biggest hurdles for data center development today is the long wait in interconnection queues. In regions like PJM Interconnection, developers often face waits of three to five years before new projects can connect to the grid. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) filings show similar delays across multiple regions, as utilities and grid operators struggle to process unprecedented volumes of requests.
Demand-response agreements like Google’s offer a potential workaround. By agreeing to curtail loads during peak demand, data centers can be granted faster interconnection approvals since they present less risk to overall system stability. This demand flexibility can effectively “buy time” for utilities to complete needed transmission upgrades without forcing developers into indefinite delays.
The economics of such deals often involve capacity payments or bill reductions. In some cases, utilities compensate large customers for agreeing to be interruptible loads, either through reduced rates or direct payments during grid events. For Google, this creates both a cost-saving opportunity and a reputational benefit: helping the grid while accelerating the timeline for new capacity to come online.
Industry Implications
Google’s participation could set a precedent for how AI-driven companies interact with the grid. If hyperscale operators normalize demand-response as part of their standard operations, utilities may increasingly expect—or even require—similar commitments from other large energy users. That shift could ripple across data center site selection, power purchase agreements, and the economics of interconnection.
For now, Google’s agreements with I&M and TVA remain early pilots. But if they prove successful, they could reshape the conversation about balancing AI growth with grid reliability in the United States and beyond.